1883 is Taylor Sheridan’s prequel to his smash hit Yellowstone. In my review of Yellowstone I said this, “In the show we have beautiful, majestic scenery joined with Celtic-like sad, mournful music. Those two film “props” enhance the feeling that we are losing something.” Which is true of 1883 (2021), too.
Taylor Sheridan’s worldview dominates the story, as it does in Yellowstone. Let’s get into it.
Taylor Sheridan’s worldview dominates the story
It dominates the story via dialogue. Otherwise known as, in writer speak, voice. Additionally, his worldview shines through via characterization. Furthermore, these two elements of story(telling) combine with the setting, title, and plot, to tell and show the author’s worldview, or big idea/theme. (AKA philosophy.)
Taylor Sheridan’s worldview is one of Americanism, or Trumpism. That’s right. (See the chapter “Freud On Trumpism” in my book Election 2016.) Notwithstanding that might be a jagged pill for many people to swallow.
Elsa Dutton
is the narrator of the story. She’s a seventeen year old girl, born in 1866. Conceived during the aftermath of the civil war. Her father, James, and mother, Margaret, hardened by it. John Dutton I, is her five year old brother, and grandfather of the protagonist in Yellowstone, John Dutton III. They are headed west from Texas with a wagon train of immigrants; led by a jaded, callous, tough, hard, traumatized, former captain soldier, Shea Brennan.
The Characters Speak:
Death is everywhere.
Maybe God didn’t create it for us?
Life is a balance between being animal and man.
The only family I give a shit about is mine. I hope I made that clear.
Killing means nothing to me.
You either police yourselves, or I’ll do it.
It’s the world I don’t trust.
Our baby-girl is turning into a woman, she rides good. No fear; but not reckless. She rides like you.
I’m worried it’s not fair.
What would you change?
Not a thing.
I’m gonna build you a house–so big you’ll get lost in it.
In general I am unhappy – but here now with you – I’m happy.
What purpose does pain serve? Grief?
Living without them … why?
When you love someone you trade souls with them–they get a piece of yours, and you theirs. You and they see through each others eyes.
Maybe the wind is the world laughing at us?
Heaven and Hell coexist right beside each other.
The journey is the destination.
This land hates us and everyone can feel it.
You’re a dreamer, I’m a believer. There’s a difference.
I’m a woman–I pick myself up.
Warriors don’t cry.
Where your dreams and memories meet–that’s heaven.
Conclusion.
This is not for everyone. It’s very tough, rough. Realistic in my view. More like the way things were; and the way they are. Taylor Sheridan’s worldview dominates the story, which I would sum up this way: He believes in rugged individualism and strength–for both men and women. Furthermore, in an attachment to the land. Moreover–in moral ambiguity. Survival depends on individual strength, and leadership. Ensconced within a loyalty to family.
Have you watched the show? What do you think? Can you tell the speaker just from the words they say?